How the list is scored
How the aviator casino checks work: clauses, registers and dates
Every numbered casino is judged on five points taken from its own terms and its licence issuer's register, and it enters the list only when Aviator by Spribe sits in its own lobby.
The aviator casino checks behind the roster are narrow on purpose. They ask what an operator has put in writing about identity checks, and whether its licence can be matched to its domain in the issuer's own register. Nothing else moves a casino up or down.
Each check is a yes or a no, so a casino scores between zero and five. The twelve numbered casinos on the ranked list of lobbies carrying the game run from four points down to one.
The five aviator casino checks, each with an example
1. An identity-check clause is printed. The terms have to say in writing that the operator may ask for documents. All twelve numbered casinos pass this one. Wolfbet shows how low the floor is: cl. 5 ¶1 of its terms gives it this point and nothing more, which is why it closes the list with a single point.
Own capture, fun mode, 7 September 2026, resized and re-encoded and otherwise untouched.
2. The clause names when the check begins. A clause that reserves a right to ask “at any time” without naming a moment fails here. Sportsbet.io passes, because cl. 6.5 and 6.6 tie the check to withdrawal. BetFury does not, since cl. 5.2 and 17.2 leave the moment open, and the card says “Moment not stated”.
3. The clause prints a sum. A money figure has to appear in the identity clause itself. TG.Casino passes this check; Winz.io, despite scoring well elsewhere, does not, and its card loses the third point.
4. The terms set a deadline for documents. A fixed period for sending papers has to be written down. Only two numbered casinos manage it, Winz.io and Metaspins. Metaspins shows how the points combine: it passes checks one, two and four and fails three and five, which adds up to three.
5. The licence appears in the issuer's register under the casino's domain. The register entry has to name the domain the casino actually trades on. BetFury passes, as the cert.cga.cw lookup for betfury.io on 16 September 2026 returned OGL/2024/1494/0942 as active. Winna fails, because the Tobique holder list names GG Gaming S.R. L. but prints no domains, so winna.com has nothing to attach to. Hyper Lucky fails for another reason: its Anjouan entry carries an expiry of 28 August 2026, a date already past.
A point is never split. A clause that almost names a moment, or a register entry that lists the company but not the domain, earns nothing for that check.
The entry rule: the game in the operator's own lobby
Scoring comes second. On 16 September 2026 each lobby was opened, and a casino receives a number only when Aviator by Spribe was there and the terms could be scored. The lobby address is kept with each card, for example bitsler.com/en/casino/games/spribe-aviator for Bitsler or winz.io/game/spribe/aviator for Winz.io.
The rule keeps the roster about the game this site covers, and it runs before any of the aviator casino checks are applied. A casino with tidy terms but no Aviator in its lobby does not belong on a page about Aviator, however well it might score. This scoring rule sits behind the numbered cards that make up the the ranked casinos roster on the home page.
Some casinos appear below the numbered cards by name only, with no score attached.
Evidence: clause, date and address
Every filled cell rests on three things. The first is the clause, quoted by number so a reader can find it in the operator's terms. The second is the date the document or register was read. The third is the address where it was read, whether a terms page, a lobby page or a register such as cert.cga.cw.
Sportsbet.io's licence cell shows all three at once: MBet Solutions N.V. holds OGL/2023/110/0072, the register returned it as active on 16 September 2026, and cl. 1.2 of the terms repeats that number. Where two documents disagree, both stay on the card. Metaspins prints an Anjouan number in cl. 1.1. A Curaçao lookup dated 12 September 2026 found a second licence, OGL/2024/1063/0437, listed for metaspins.com. Neither is chosen over the other.
Dates are not all the same, because documents were read at different times. A register entry checked on one day can change on the next, and the date beside it makes that visible.
A field with nothing to put in it shows a dash. Sportsbet.io, Hyper Lucky and WinDice have a dash where a withdrawal cap would go, and several cards have a dash for the coin list. Why the coin field matters when paying is explained on its own page. A dash carries no score and no comment; it is simply an empty field.
Where the fun-mode screens come from
The round figures quoted across the site come from screens the editors captured in Vave's fun mode on 7 September 2026. The frame shows a FUN MODE band, a Provably Fair Game label and a Powered by SPRIBE mark, so the source of the game is visible in every shot.
Those screens support the arithmetic: 4.60 cashed at 2.21× credited as 10.16, 100.00 cashed at 2.53× paying 253.00, rounds lasting 10 to 30 seconds, and a past result of 1,095.11×, which is a round that took place and not a ceiling. They run on a play balance, so they show how the game behaves and nothing about how any operator handles money. The free version of the round explains that limit, and the return worked through in rupees uses the same screens as its starting point.
Own capture, fun mode, 7 September 2026, resized and re-encoded and otherwise untouched.
Fairness details come from Spribe's own game and fairness pages, not from any casino, and the studio's published facts collects them.
The two real-money tests at Vave and TrustDice
Two accounts were funded with the editors' own money, and they are the only tests of their kind behind this site.
At Vave on 28 August 2026, money went in and came back out, and withdrawals totalling about 5,000 USDT passed with no ID check. That is one account over one period. Vave's cl. 8.7 still allows an ID request before any payout.
At TrustDice in May 2026, USDT was deposited over several weeks. Withdrawals needed no verification until the running sum went above about US$5,000, after which a request went to payment under review and a compliance email with a Veriff link arrived. A driving licence was refused, a passport was accepted at the fifth attempt, and more documents were requested by email later on.
Neither result feeds a score. How the identity clauses compare across the list shows the written side next to these two accounts. The tests show how two clauses played out once; the points still come from what the terms print.
What stays outside the aviator casino checks
Three things that often decide other lists carry no weight here. Bonus size is left out, because a bonus is a marketing offer and says nothing about identity checks or licences. The number of games is left out, because the list only needs one game to be present. How quickly a cashier pays is left out as well, since speed sits outside everything the five checks measure.
Withdrawal caps and coin lists are printed on the cards, with their clauses, but they are not scored either. A cap such as Wolfbet's US$8,000 a week (cl. 15 ¶5) is useful to know before a deposit, yet it does not change the five points.
Why the method stops where it does, and what it refuses to claim, is on who runs this site; the commercial side of it is on how this site earns, and the conditions attached to using any of it on the site terms.
The Vave card sits above the numbered cards without a number or a score. Its cells follow the same evidence rules: licence OGL/2024/1676/0905 held by Latcas B.V., the certificate listing vavegame.com on 12 September 2026, and clauses 8.7 and 8.8 quoted by number. How the round itself plays is covered separately, since no score touches the game.