The editorial position, stated plainly

Who runs this site, and the difference between reading and playing

Every figure on this site comes from a document somebody opened and dated: an operator's own terms, a licence register entry, or Spribe's published return. Nothing here comes from having played for money.

Editor: Wilfred Oakes Last updated: 20 October 2026

This site covers one game and the casinos whose lobbies carry it. That narrow scope is the reason it can be specific: Aviator is a single title from a single studio, so the game behaves the same everywhere, and the only thing that actually differs between casinos is the rulebook wrapped around it. Those rulebooks are public. Reading them is the whole job.

What a claim here has to carry

A figure reaches a page only with three things attached: where it came from, what it says exactly, and when it was read.

The practical effect is that the site quotes clause numbers. When a page says a payout is capped, it names the clause that caps it — Wolfbet's US$8,000 a week, 100,000 USDT a week at Winz.io, Vave's cl. 8.7 on identity before a first payout. A reader who thinks the figure is wrong can open the same document and see. That is the only kind of authority a site like this can honestly have.

Licences follow the same rule, with one extra step. A number printed in a casino's footer proves nothing on its own; it has to appear in the issuing authority's register, under the domain actually being used. That check is the reason the roster separates casinos whose entries confirm into a register from those where the number exists only on their own page.

The four on the left are everything the studio puts on the record: a 97% return to player, a round of ten to thirty seconds, a minimum stake of 0.10 and a release in 2019. The three on the right are the maximum multiplier, the maximum win and the ceiling on a single stake. Each empty cell carries its reason, because a bare blank cannot be told apart from a figure nobody bothered to look up.

What this site does not claim

No play for money. No page here reports a deposit, a withdrawal time, a support reply or a bonus actually cleared at any listed casino.
No invented people. No named reviewers, no photographs, no tester profiles, no “our team of analysts”.
No prediction. Nothing here claims to know where a round will end, and the pages on predictors, signals and hack files exist to explain why nothing can.
No top multiplier. Spribe does not publish a ceiling, so none is given. A screen showing 1,095.11× is a result that happened once, not a limit.
No cashier rankings. Withdrawal speed cannot be read from a document, and the score does not include it.

Why the scoring is so narrow

The roster scores five things, all of them drawn from the operator's own writing: whether an identity clause exists, whether it names the moment it applies, whether it prints a sum, whether it sets a deadline for documents, and whether the licence resolves in a register. Bonus size, game counts and the look of the lobby carry no weight at all.

That looks stingy next to a site that scores casinos out of ten on everything. It is deliberate. Those five points measure one quality — how much of its own rulebook the operator was willing to put in writing — and that quality is both checkable and useful. A casino that writes down when it will ask for documents is telling a player something real. A casino with a bigger welcome offer is not. The reasoning in full sits in how the checks are scored.

How this site makes money

A reader who opens the casino through the button on these pages may generate a commission for this site. That arrangement pays for the work and it is a genuine conflict of interest, so it is described in detail on its own page rather than in a line of small print: how this site earns.

What the arrangement does not buy is a position in the roster. The scored cards are ordered by the five checks, and the commercial card sits outside the numbering without a score, because scoring something you are paid to recommend would make the whole column meaningless.

Correcting a page

What a visit to these pages records is set out on privacy and data, and the conditions attached to reading them on the site terms.

Operators rewrite terms quietly, renumber clauses and change caps. When that happens the page is wrong and the document is right. Every figure on the site carries its read date for exactly this reason — it lets a reader see how old a claim is before trusting it, and it marks what needs re-reading first.

If playing has stopped being a choice rather than a pastime, the roster and the scoring are beside the point; playing within limits has the practical part and where to find help.

Frequently asked questions

Is there a named reviewer behind these pages?

No, and inventing one would be the easiest way to make this site less trustworthy than it is. The pages are maintained by the site's owner rather than a staff of testers. Where a claim needs authority it carries the document instead: a clause number, a register entry and the date it was read. That is checkable by a stranger; a byline is not.

Has anyone here played Aviator with real money?

Not at the casinos listed on this site, and no page says otherwise. Where a page describes a withdrawal limit or an identity request, it is quoting the clause that sets it, not recounting an experience. The one thing experience would add is cashier speed, which is why no page ranks casinos on how fast they pay.

Why do some cards have gaps instead of figures?

Because the operator did not publish the figure. A missing minimum deposit or an unstated withdrawal cap is printed as missing rather than filled in from a comparison site. Guessing one number quietly is how a whole page stops being worth reading.

What happens if a figure on this site is wrong?

Terms change without notice and a clause number can shift in a rewrite, so some figures go stale between reads. Each one carries the date it was taken. If a clause now says something different, the operator's current terms win and the page is the thing that needs fixing.